This book argues that the political and security threats posed by the domestic radical right in Western countries have been consistently exaggerated since 1945. This has allowed governments to justify censoring and repressing their political opponents, including many who cannot be fairly described as being affiliated with the radical right.

The authors argue that the potential threat of a resurgence of "fascism" has been consistently exaggerated from 1945 until present day; that the ongoing lack of conceptual and definitional clarity with respect to terms like "fascism," the "radical right," the "alt right," "white supremacism," "populism," "racism," etc., has enabled ill-informed or dishonest commentators to distort their meaning and abusively misapply those labels so as to delegitimize their political opponents; and that the political and economic elites in charge of contemporary Western societies are now deliberately exaggerating and exploiting the threat posed by the domestic radical right in order to facilitate vilifying, harassing, de-platforming, censoring, "canceling," and repressing disgruntled citizens (no matter where they may lie along the political spectrum) who openly criticize and vigorously oppose their agendas. The authors also advocate the use of well-established scholarly methods for carrying out research on the right and provide precise definitions of various terms in order to facilitate the development of more accurate categorizations.

Introduction: Instigating “Brown Scares” and “Moral Panics” about the Radical Right and “Fascism”

Chapter 1: Biases and Double Standards in Assessing the Role and Impact of Ideologies

Chapter 2: Towards an Academic Consensus about the “Radical Right” and “Fascism”?

Chapter 3: The Islamic Radical Right (Islamism) is a Greater Threat to Democracy and Security than “Fascism”

Chapter 4: The Never-Ending “Brown Scare” since 1945—Is “Fascism” Really “On the March”?

Chapter 5: Some Suggestions for Improving Analyses of the Radical Right