The Author: Ezequiel Adamovsky has a Ph.D. in History (SSEES/University College London) and is currently Professor of Russian History at the University of Buenos Aires, and Researcher at the National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET) in Argentina. He has published books and articles in prestigious academic journals of several countries, mainly in the field of intellectual history.

Exklusives Verkaufsrecht für: Gesamte Welt.

Contents: The Beginning of the Philosophical Debate on Russia: from Montesquieu to Mably - Diderot and the Emergence of a Liberal-Bourgeois Image of Russia - The Liberal-Bourgeois Image of Russia: the Making of a Tradition - Challenges to the Liberal Representation of Russia: Romantic Conservatives and Socialists - Russia as Communism: the Response of the Liberals - Liberal Perceptions and the Emergence of an Academic Knowledge of Russia in France - Ideas in Perspective: The Grand Narrative of 'Civilisation' - Geographical Imagination in Perspective: The Parallel Russia/USA and the Making of Euro-Orientalism.

Drawing from a range of critical perspectives, in particular postcolonial, this book examines the relationship between perceptions of Russia and of Eastern Europe and the making of a 'Western' identity. It explores the ways in which the perception of certain characteristics of Russia and Eastern Europe, whether real or attributed, was shaped by (and used for) the construction of a liberal narrative of the West, which eventually became dominant. The focus of this inquiry is French culture, from the beginning of the debate about Russia among the philosophes (c.1740) to the consolidation of a professional field of Slavic studies (c.1880). A wide range of writing - literature, travel accounts, histories, political tracts, scientific journals, and parliamentary debates - is examined through the work of major authors (from Montesquieu, Diderot and Rousseau to Tocqueville, de Maistre and Guizot, from Mme. de Staël, Hugo and Balzac to Dumas, Michelet and Comte), as well as that of many less well known figures. The book also explores possible continuities between those first academic accounts of Russia and Eastern Europe and present-day scholarship in Europe and the USA, to show that the liberal ideological accounts constructed in the nineteenth century still to a great extent inform contemporary academic studies.