Dr. theol. Thomas Kaufmann ist Professor für Kirchengeschichte an der Universität Göttingen.
Professor Dr. phil., Dr. theol. h.c. mult. Hartmut Lehmann ist em. Professor für Geschichte der Neuzeit an der Universität Kiel. Hartmut Lehmann war von 1987 - 1993 Gründungsdirektor des Deutschen Historischen Instituts in Washington, D.C. und 1993 - 2004 Direktor am Max-Planck-Institut für Geschichte in Göttingen. Seit 1993 ist Lehmann Mitglied der Göttinger Akademie der Wissenschaften und Foreign Honorary Member der American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Dr. theol. h.c. der Universitäten Basel, Helsinki und Lund.

Alec Ryrie is Professor of the History of Christianity at Durham University.

The distinction between radicalism and it's opposite is an inheritance of the Lutheran Reformation of the 1520s, which shaped not only the later course of the Reformation in the Holy Roman Empire but also attitudes towards and writings on religious dissent in the Netherlands and England.

What Radicalism meant during the Reformation

Contributions explore the themes of radicalism and dissent within Protestantism. The comparisons highlight the contingent nature of particular settlements and narratives, and reveal the extent to which the definition of religious radicalism was dependent upon immediate context and show that radicalism and dissent were truly transnational phenomena. The historiography of the so-called radical reformation has been unduly shaped by the hostile categories imposed by mainstream or magisterial reformers during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.

This volume of essays explores the themes of radicalism and dissent within Protestantism. The comparisons highlight the contingent nature of particular settlements and narratives, and reveal the extent to which the definition of religious radicalism was dependent upon immediate context and show that radicalism and dissent were truly transnational phenomena. The historiography of the so-called radical reformation has been unduly shaped by the hostile categories imposed by mainstream or magisterial reformers during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. This volume argues that scholars should adopt an open-ended understanding of evangelical reform, and recognize that the boundaries between radicalism and its opposite were not always firmly drawn. The distinction between the two is an inheritance of the Lutheran Reformation of the 1520s, which shaped not only the later course of the Reformation in the Holy Roman Empire but also attitudes towards and writings on religious dissent in the Netherlands and England. Radical critique is immanent within mainstream Protestantism, in a faith that emphasizes the power of the gospel with its unrelenting demands.