Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject Politics - International Politics - General and Theories, grade: 1,3, Bielefeld University, course: Global Governanance by Global Frameworks, 24 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In this written homework I will use the term “globalization” to “describe the growth ...

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject Politics - International Politics - General and Theories, grade: 1,3, Bielefeld University, course: Global Governanance by Global Frameworks, language: English, abstract: In this written homework I will use the term “globalization” to “describe the growth andspread in investment, trade, and production, the introduction of new technology, and thespread of democracy around the world”. (ibid. 2003: 1). It has to be noticed that this economicglobalization “would affect not only production, finance, technology, media and fashionbut also the international political system, leading also to a globalization of democracy“(Archibugi 2004: 438) Here it is important to note, that on the one hand I support the claimthat the ideas of democracy are globalized, on the other hand , however, there has to be keptin mind, the constraint that democracy is only global as a formal or structural blueprint. Theflexible characteristics and focuses of democracy differ in many ways; therefore it is not possibleto state that an all-embracing final democratic model exists.According to Pauly the impact of globalization shortens national capacities so that they become“inefficient regulators of markets that cross their borders, ..” (Pauly 2000: 4) Thisraises questions about the democratic legitimacy of an increasingly internationally operatinggovernment and international institutions with an indefinite and not clearly defined designationof legitimacy caused by a weak democratic proportion on a global level.Additionally one can observe a rapidly growing number of non-state actors and rising influencelike TNCs and NGOs. Approaches concerning the processing of these topics are describedunder the wide field of “global governance”.The theoretical discussion and their discourse offer help to take a look on today’s institutionsand their problems, the role of the state and the possible implementation approaches of theoretical ideas towards a democratic form of global governance. One solution, obviously, would be a transfer of states´ sovereignty to a regional or global level.I will concentrate on the confrontation of two basic models of democracy beyond the nationstatethe Cosmopolitan Democracy and the Deliberative Democracy. Based on different normativeassumptions they have different ideas of how to create a more adequate form of governance.I will present both concepts separately followed by an all-embracing valuation and aconclusion.