Translating Authors:John Kronen got his undergraduate degree at Marquette University in 1985, and his doctorate at the State University of New York at Buffalo. He studied under Jorge Gracia at Buffalo,and his dissertation concerned the substantial unity of material substances. He has taught at St. Tho-mas since 1990. His areas of specialty include Baroque Scholasticism, Metaphysics, and Indian Philo-sophy. Jeremiah Reedy Professor Emeritus of Classics specialized in textual criticism and Indo-European linguistics at the University of Michigan. His current interests include Latin and Greek (languages and literature), mythology, and Greek philosophy. His publications include translations and editions of both Greek and Latin works, plus articles on many aspects of Greek philosophy. Since retiring in 2004 he has been doing research, writing, and teaching at the U. of St. Thomas as an adjunct professor.

Table of ContentsIntroduction 9DE ANIMA________ Disputation I: On the Substance of the Soul in General 30Question 1 Whether the soul is act in the sense of being a substantial form 30Question 2Whether and in what way the soul is first act 45Question 3Whether the soul possesses an essential ordination to an organic body 65Question 4What the quidditative definition of the soul isand how one definition is proven through another 84 DE ANIMA________ Disputation II 108 Question 3Whether the principle of understanding in humansis something incorporeal, subsistent, and immortal 108Bibliography 177

Suarez's De Anima is his second most important philosophical work after his celebrated Metaphysical Disputations, and like the Disputations, it is incredibly thorough. Indeed, it is the most complete treatment of the nature of living beings from an Aristotelian point of view ever penned. In it Suarez treats questions we would now ascribe to such separate disciplines as metaphysics, epistemology, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of biology. The selections translated here, the first English translation of any part of the De anima, give the reader a good sample of some of the central metaphysical questions treated in the De anima. The first selection, consisting of all of Disputation I, provides Suarez's solution to difficult questions concerning the nature of the soul in general; specifically it addresses the way it is first act, its quiddita-tive definition, and its relation to the body, the composite, and the essential accidents of the living organism it partially constitutes. The second selection, consisting of question 3 of Disputation 2, reviews and defends all the philoso-phical arguments, whether metaphysical or moral, found in the Christian tradition for the conclusion that the rational soul is immaterial and immortal.